How Has Statistical Testing in Orthopedics Changed Over Time? An Assessment of High Impact Journals Over 25 Years.

BACKGROUND: It is important for physicians to be familiar with statistical techniques commonly used in published medical research. Statistical errors in medical literature are common, and there is a reported lack of understanding regarding statistical knowledge necessary for data interpretation and journal reading. As study design has become increasingly complex, peer-reviewed literature poorly addresses and explains the most common statistical methods utilized across leading orthopedic journals. METHODS: Articles from 5 leading general and subspecialty orthopedic journals were compiled from 3 distinct time periods. After exclusions were applied, 9521 remained, and a random 5% sampling of these articles, balanced across journals and years, was conducted yielding 437 articles after additional exclusions. Information regarding the number of statistical tests used, power/sample size calculation, type of statistical tests used, level of evidence (LOE), study type, and study design was collected. RESULTS: The mean number of statistical tests across all 5 orthopedic journals increased from 1.39 to 2.29 by 2018 (p = 0.007). The percentage of articles that reported power/sample size analyses was not found to differ by year, but the value has increased from 2.6% in 1994 to 21.6% in 2018 (p = 0.081). The most commonly used statistical test was the t-test which was present in 20.5% of articles, followed by chi-square test (13%), Mann-Whitney analysis (12.6%) and analysis of variance (ANOVA, 9.6%). The mean number of tests was generally greater in articles from higher impact factor journals (p = 0.013). Studies with a LOE of I used the highest mean number of statistical tests (3.23) compared to studies with lower LOE ratings (range 1.66-2.69, p < 0.001). Randomized control trials used the highest mean number of statistical test (3.31), while case series used the lowest mean number of tests (1.57, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mean number of statistical tests used per article has increased over the past 25 years with the t-test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney analysis, and ANOVA being the most used statistical tests in leading orthopedic journals. Despite an increase in statistical tests it should be noted that there was a paucity in advance statistical testing within the orthopedic literature. This study displays important trends in data analysis and can serve as a guide to help clinicians and trainees better understand the statistics used in literature as well as identifying deficits within the literature that should be addressed to help progress the field of orthopedics.

Use of Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Complications in Tibia Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of computed tomography angiography identified infrapopliteal vascular injury to predict complications in tibia fractures that do not require vascular surgical intervention. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review. SETTING: Six Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: Two hundred seventy-four patients with tibia fractures (OTA/AO 42 or 43) who underwent computed tomography angiography maintained a clinically perfused foot not requiring vascular surgical intervention and were treated with an intramedullary nail. Patients were grouped by the number of vessels below the trifurcation that were injured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Rates of superficial and deep infection, amputation, unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (nonunion), and any unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: There were 142 fractures in the control (no-injury) group, 87 in the one-vessel injury group, and 45 in the two-vessel injury group. Average follow-up was 2 years. Significantly higher rates of nerve injury and flap coverage after wound breakdown were observed in the two-vessel injury group. The two-vessel injury group had higher rates of deep infection (35.6% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.030) and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing (44.4% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.019) compared with controls, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with control and one-vessel injury groups (71.1% vs. 39.4% and 51.7%, P < 0.001), respectively. There were no significant differences in rates of superficial infection or amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibia fractures with two-vessel injuries were associated with higher rates of deep infection and unplanned reoperation to promote bone healing compared with those without vascular injury, as well as increased rates of any unplanned reoperation compared with controls and fractures with one-vessel injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does Insurance Status Affect Access to Care Among Ankle Fracture Patients? An Institutional Retrospective Study.

Delayed access to care for patients with ankle fractures may increase risk of complications, particularly if surgical management is warranted. Medicaid is a state and federal insurance program in place for those with low income, which has previously been associated with delayed access to care among patients with ACL tears and total hip arthroplasties. The purpose of this study is to assess whether patient insurance status affects access to care for ankle fracture patients, using data from a single institution. A retrospective cohort study (N = 311 patients)was performed on individuals that underwent open reduction and internal fixation for an ankle fracture between years 01/2008 and 12/2018. Patients with polytraumatic injuries, open injuries, Medicare, no insurance, indigent/charity insurance, self-pay, or whose insurance information was not available were excluded. Time from date of injury to date of surgery, injury to first visit, and first visit to surgery was compared between patients with private insurance and Medicaid. Average time from injury to first appointment was 1.2 days and 6.2 days for privately insured and Medicaid patients, respectively (p < .001). Average time from injury to surgery was 8.3 days and 16.1 days for privately insured and Medicaid patients, respectively (p < .001). Patients enrolled in Medicaid have significantly delayed access to care compared to those with private insurance. For ankle fracture patients this is a critical healing time, and delayed care may result in increased costs, increased utilization of healthcare resources, higher complication rates, and poorer patient outcomes.

Publishing Characteristics of Foot and Ankle Research Over a 15-Year Time Interval: A Review of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery from 2004 to 2018.

BACKGROUND: As the foot and ankle subspecialty continues to grow in orthopaedics, trends in published literature provide valuable insights to help understand and strengthen the field. The current study evaluates the changes in the characteristics of foot and ankle articles in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (American Volume) (JBJS-A) from 2004 to 2018. METHODS: Foot and ankle-related articles in JBJS-A from 2004 to 2018 were identified and categorized by type of study, level of evidence, number of authors, academic degree(s) of the first and last authors, male and female authorship, number of citations, number of references, region of publication, and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: A total of 336 foot and ankle articles from 2004 to 2018 were reviewed. The type of study published has changed over time, with more clinical therapeutic evidence and less case reports. The level of evidence grades, as rated by JBJS-A and objective evaluators, have increased over the past 15 years. The total number of authors per article has increased, and female authorship has increased significantly. The number of references per article has increased, and the number of citations per year has decreased. The field of foot and ankle surgery has seen an increase in global publications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the foot and ankle literature that has been published in JBJS-A has continued to increase in quality and diversity over the past 15 years.

Tibiotalocalcaneal nail failure in a 60-year-old male: Case report and surgical technique.

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is a hindfoot fusion that can treat numerous conditions including osteoarthritis, Charcot arthropathy, avascular necrosis of the talus, and severe deformity. The goal of fusion is to create solid union across the joint while correcting deformity, leaving a shoeable plantigrade foot. Multiple biomechanical studies have demonstrated similar performance when comparing the properties of plate and nail constructs for TTC arthrodesis. Plate fixation and retrograde intramedullary nailing (IMN) are successful in achieving TTC fusion and favorable postoperative outcomes. Despite generally favorable outcomes, TTC arthrodesis carries the risk of complications including nonunion, infection, hardware failure, and revision surgery. We present a case of an individual who presented with a complete break of the IMN after TTC arthrodesis. We also describe the technique used for extraction of the broken nail.